Home/Compare/AI coding agents/Aedeon vs Blitzy
Aedeon vs Blitzy · Updated October 13, 2026
Blitzy runs thousands of agents for days on a spec and hands back most of a project. Aedeon is the system of record for how your software actually works, and the engine that evolves it.
Both products start by reading your code into a knowledge graph. After that they part ways. Blitzy is built around one long autonomous run. Aedeon plans each change from a single sentence, shows its price before anyone approves it, and checks the result against the old system on your production traffic before it ships.
How the work moves
Blitzy
Lane note: Blitzy’s FAQ says a job cannot be canceled once submitted.
Aedeon
Lane note: You pay for the credits the steps actually used.
Blitzy is designed to return as much of a project as it can from one run. Aedeon is designed so that each change is priced, approved and verified before it ships.
At a glance
The short answer
Blitzy
Blitzy sells autonomous software development to large enterprises. Its platform reverse engineers codebases of 100 million lines and more into a knowledge graph. Blitzy then coordinates thousands of agents across days or weeks to deliver 80 percent or more of a project as compiled, tested code, with a guide for the remaining work.
Aedeon
Aedeon maps your applications, databases, pipelines and business rules into one living graph and keeps it as your system of record. You describe an outcome in one sentence. Aedeon Supervisor writes the plan and its estimated cost, a person approves every gate, and Aedeon Evolve verifies the result on production traffic before it lands in your Git.
Which to choose
Choose Blitzy for large build programs where output per run matters most and your team will finish and test the remainder. Aedeon is the better fit when every change to a running system has to be priced, approved and proven before it ships, and you want the map kept for the next one.
The knowledge graph
Blitzy and Aedeon agree on the first step: read the code before changing it. The difference is what the graph is for, and who relies on it afterward.
Blitzy
Blitzy describes its graph as a dynamic knowledge graph of your codebase. It keeps every agent grounded while context is managed across days of reasoning, and it improves with every merge. Reverse engineering also produces technical documentation of the codebase.
Aedeon
Aedeon Graph is the Code Intelligence Graph, a living map of how your systems actually work. It is tenant-isolated, stamped with the commit, schema version or pipeline revision behind each fact, and exportable. Every plan is written against it, and every claim an agent makes has to cite it.
Ask the graph · illustrative billing example from Aedeon’s product demo
What breaks if oracle.billing changes?
Connected to 12: billing ORM mappings, invoices, rate_tiers, accounts, payments, ledger_entries, sp_calc_rate_tier, sp_post_payment, sp_close_period, pci_mask_policy, sox_audit_policy and 11 Oracle integration tests.
Citesoracle.billing · billing-db · direct dependents
Where does the rate-tier rule live?
In the billing database, inside the stored procedure sp_calc_rate_tier, outside the application code.
Citesbilling-db · sp_calc_rate_tier.sql
What does this change touch outside the billing repository?
The nightly reconciliation job, two compliance checks that run as database policies, and the dbt model behind the BI feed.
Citesops/nightly_recon.py · db/policies/*.sql · warehouse/dbt/models/billing.sql
Nodes each answer touches light up
What you hand over
Blitzy
Blitzy recommends prompts written in WHY, WHAT and HOW sections, then asks your team to edit and approve a technical specification before code generation starts. By default it adopts upgrades along the way. Ask for Java 21 and it implements virtual threads unless you tell it to make as few changes as possible.
Aedeon
Aedeon starts from one plain sentence. From it, Aedeon Supervisor builds a step-by-step plan out of the map of your systems, with target files for each step and an estimated cost. Your architects can add, remove or reorder steps before anything happens.
Checking the work
Blitzy
Blitzy compiles your codebase, performs runtime validation, generates end-to-end tests and passes the work through several QA agents. Its own FAQ advises teams to run their own QA, QC and security testing before deployment.
Aedeon
Aedeon checks the changed system against the old one on your production traffic. Data, application and behavior checks run in parallel and every response is compared. A divergence stops the gate until it is fixed and replayed. On The New York Times change, 2,412,880 requests were replayed and the gate opened at zero divergences.
Pricing as of October 13, 2026
Blitzy is sold as an evaluation followed by an engagement. Aedeon is software your team can start on with one repository this week.
Aedeon’s monthly plans include evolution credits, and credits used beyond the allowance are billed at the plan’s rate. Production change runs on Max and Virtual Private Aedeon.
Blitzy’s figures are the annual investment levels on its own site. Forbes reported in May 2026 that Blitzy’s starting packages run from $1 million to $10 million a year plus 20 cents per line of code.
The two models reward different habits. A six- or seven-figure engagement is planned like a program, with a start and an end. Aedeon prices each change before it runs, and the graph from the first change makes the next one cheaper.
Aedeon keeps the map after a change ships. Your second change starts from a graph that already knows which report reads that column, which job runs at 3 a.m. and which compliance check lives in the database. In Aedeon’s illustrative cost index, the first change sits at 100 and the tenth at 19.
Side by side
| Blitzy | Aedeon | |
|---|---|---|
| How the work runs | ||
| What it is | Autonomous software development platform for enterprise codebases | The system of record for how your software works, and the engine that evolves it |
| What you hand over | A structured prompt and an approved technical specification | One sentence of intent |
| Knowledge graph | Dynamic knowledge graph of the codebase that improves with every merge | Code Intelligence Graph across apps, databases, pipelines and rules; version-stamped and exportable |
| How work runs | Thousands of agents run uninterrupted for days or weeks | Gate by gate; nothing executes until a person approves it |
| What comes back | About 80% of a project as compiled, tested code, plus a guide to the rest | A change verified on production traffic, committed to your Git with full provenance |
| Verification | Compilation, runtime validation, generated end-to-end tests and QA agents; teams run their own QA before deployment | Production traffic replayed against the old system; a divergence stops the gate |
| Cost and control | ||
| Cost visibility | Annual investment tiers; a submitted job consumes its assigned quota | Estimated cost shown before approval; you pay for the credits used |
| Stopping work | Jobs cannot be canceled once submitted | Any step can be rejected, and a divergence holds the gate |
| Entry point | Sandbox at $0 for eligible organizations, list $25,000; $250,000 Structured Pilot | Free 30-day trial; Pro from $20 a month |
| Deployment and buying | ||
| Deployment | Blitzy Cloud VPC or single tenant; customer VPC, on-premises and black box at the top tier | A private VPC in your cloud; your cloud or multi-cloud on Max; single-tenant sovereign region and air-gapped on Virtual Private Aedeon |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS and HIPAA in progress |
| Commercial model | Evaluation, then engagement tiers | Product subscription plus usage; services partners contract separately |
| Best fit | Large build or refactor programs measured by output per run | Changes to running systems that must be priced, approved and proven |
Blitzy details from blitzy.com and Blitzy’s public announcements, checked October 13, 2026.
Decide
Blitzy and Aedeon can coexist. A team might use Blitzy for a large greenfield build and Aedeon for the changes that touch the systems already running the business.
Answers
Blitzy runs thousands of agents for days or weeks on a spec and returns about 80 percent of a project as compiled, tested code for your team to finish. Aedeon plans each change to a running system from one sentence, prices it before approval, gates every step and verifies the result against the old system on production traffic. Blitzy is built for output per run, and Aedeon for proof per change.
Blitzy is a commercial platform, and its site describes 27 patents and counting. Its open-source case studies show Blitzy working on public repositories, such as a COBOL to Java 21 conversion. Aedeon is also commercial software, and the graph and every change it produces belong to you and can be exported.
As of October 13, 2026, Blitzy’s site lists a Sandbox at $0 for eligible organizations, marked down from $25,000, and a Structured Pilot at $250,000 a year. Its engagements run $500,000 a year for Core, about $1 million for Scale and about $10 million for Transformation. Aedeon starts with a free 30-day trial, then $20, $80 or $200 a month, with Virtual Private Aedeon from $50,000 a year.
Yes. Blitzy reverse engineers your codebase into a dynamic knowledge graph that grounds its agents and improves with every merge. Aedeon Graph plays a different role. It is the version-stamped system of record that every Aedeon plan is written against and every agent claim must cite. That graph covers databases, stored procedures, pipelines and business rules alongside application code.
It depends on how the work will be judged. If success means the most code delivered from one run, with your engineers finishing and testing the rest, Blitzy is built for that. When success means a running system changed without surprises, with every step approved and the result matched against the old system on real traffic, choose Aedeon.
Blitzy’s FAQ says jobs cannot be canceled once submitted, and a submitted job consumes its assigned quota. In Aedeon, nothing executes until a person approves the gate in front of it, your architects can reject any step, and a divergence on production traffic holds the gate.
Aedeon is a product your own team runs. Services partners can help under their own contracts, and Aedeon never bills engagement labor. Blitzy sells its larger tiers as engagements, and describes the Transformation tier as a strategic engagement.
Not yet. Aedeon’s SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS and HIPAA audits are in progress, and current status and architecture documentation are available under NDA. Blitzy states SOC 2 Type II compliance and ISO 27001 certification.
With Aedeon, connecting one system and watching the graph build takes about an hour, and a first production change usually lands inside a quarter. Blitzy describes runs that last days or weeks, and its Sandbox lets eligible organizations try it on a real codebase.
Start here
Sign up, connect one repository and watch the graph build. Describe one change and Aedeon shows the plan, the systems it touches and its estimated cost. Nothing runs until you approve it.
